Moderators: daxtojeiro, muythaibxr, jsmcortina

MidShipCivic wrote:If OEM cam phasing systems use a position wheel with the number of teeth corresponding to the number of cylinders to tell which cylinder it's on how can cam 1 use MAIN cam input which is single tooth?
Can I have it to where I use a 4 tooth wheel on the primary camshaft?
hassmaschine wrote:MidShipCivic wrote:If OEM cam phasing systems use a position wheel with the number of teeth corresponding to the number of cylinders to tell which cylinder it's on how can cam 1 use MAIN cam input which is single tooth?
Can I have it to where I use a 4 tooth wheel on the primary camshaft?
that's not how cam sensors work. the crank sensor tells the computer what cylinder is #1, the cam sensor tells the computer which cycle it's on (intake/exhaust). with a higher toothed cam wheel I'd imagine there's more precision in knowing the exact cam angles in a VVT system, but it's not strictly neccesary to have anymore than 1 tooth.



hoveringuy wrote:My recommendation at this point is that VVT either needs the ability to be disabled below a threshold CLT level, or the advance/retard needs to be scaled-down as a function of warmup enrichment. The advance profile that works well on a warm motor makes it misbehave at colder temps.
jsmcortina wrote:I don't see what relevance the extract from the Ford patent is. The Zetec VCT system is already supported.
What crank wheel arrangement does your engine use? I assume the engine is running wasted spark from the cam pattern.
James

MidShipCivic wrote:jsmcortina wrote:I don't see what relevance the extract from the Ford patent is. The Zetec VCT system is already supported.
The relevance is how some camshaft sensor give cylinder position identification, I wanted to see if I could use a higher resolution wheel for VVT on the primary camshaft.
jsmcortina wrote:MidShipCivic wrote:jsmcortina wrote:I don't see what relevance the extract from the Ford patent is. The Zetec VCT system is already supported.
The relevance is how some camshaft sensor give cylinder position identification, I wanted to see if I could use a higher resolution wheel for VVT on the primary camshaft.
Posting that is irrelevant because we already support it. You appear to be trying to tell us something that we already know and already do.
James

MidShipCivic wrote:There is not much literature on what I can and can't do since I'm retrofitting an active camgear to my engine I'm simply trying to see whats possible.
nucci wrote:I'm planning for BMW S54 VANOS actuation.
The engine uses two solenoids for each camshaft. On both cams, if you open the "inlet" solenoid it adds advance, if you open the "outlet" solenoid it adds retard, and keeping both closed holds the cam position.
Is there any reason that we couldn't do the following:
- set PID parameters with Intake - More duty means - Advance
- set PID parameters with Exhaust - More duty means - Retard
- set CAM1 as Intake (will control S54 intake cam inlet solenoid)
- set CAM2 as Exhaust (will control S54 intake cam outlet solenoid)
- set CAM3 as Intake (will control S54 exhaust cam inlet solenoid)
- set CAM4 as Exhaust (will control S54 exhaust cam outlet solenoid)
- set CAM1 and CAM2 maps identically, as both control the intake cam position
- set CAM3 and CAM4 maps identically, as both control the exhaust cam position
Does this make sense to anybody except me? Configuring each of the four channels as a "push" channel?
jsmcortina wrote:I'm looking for one tester who presently uses more than one VVT camshaft with alpha18. I've made some code changes to support 2+ cams and want to verify that I didn't break the existing support.
James
hoveringuy wrote:I was using two cams with Alpha 17, but Alpha 18 did something to my exhaust cam that I had to deactivate it.
The exhaust cam gets retarded up to 40 degrees from the default position. In Alpha 17 I had to have all 40's in the table to keep it advanced at the default setting. Values towards '0' retarded it. It appears that in Alpha 18 the same default 40 values were now retarding the cam and I couldn't get it to stay running until I deactivated the exhaust cam, haven't trouble-shot yet.
jsmcortina wrote: I've re-checked the ChangeLog and still don't see any changes relating to VVT between alpha17 and 18. So I don't see how behaviour could be different at this point.
James
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest